Customer Reviews
uninspiring - By: Neil Murphy, 27 Nov 2008 
I did a camping tour of the USSRin 1977. Before I went I attended night school for two years to learn Russian. At the side of my experiences Russia by Jonathon Dimbleby is flat & boring. He fails to bring out the depths of the people. Irritated by his maundering on about his 'problems'. he should get a life. I guess it only got published because the BBC were backing it. Advice: if you want to read it search the charity shops; there will be many dust covered copies hanging round their shelves.
Pizdets... - By: Kharms, 25 Jul 2008 Of course JD was able to work as a reporterin Russia without speaking any Russian...Re-Odd choice of presenter/writer. British reportersin Russia just follow the BBC/Times party line...so why would they have to speak any of the local language? The present Guardian correspondent speaks Russian like a small dim-witted child (from London). What chance does he have of digging up any good stories?
RE - Erroneous & misapprehending - Khordorkovsky is the hero of the BBC/liberal western media...do you seriously expect them to investigate allegations that he was responsible for murder? (Mayor of Nefteyugansk anyone?)
Odd choice of presenter/writer - By: Mr. D. Hazel, 18 Jul 2008 Jonathan Dimbleby is not a name you associate with travel writing. Having read this book all the way through, & watched all episodes of the series, it's not likely to become a name with such an association.
By his own admission, Dimbleby does not like travelling, does not like having to be away from home, & has a phobia about flying. He also speaks virtually no Russian & cannot read Cyrillic (yet was somehow able to function as a Moscow reporter during the Soviet Union days).
One thing comes across very clearly within the first few pages of this book (and remains evident throughout). Dimbleby's mindset vis-a-vis Russia is stuckin the Soviet era of the 1970s. He makes constant references to the Soviet era throughout the book, & when that doesn't provide him with sufficient material, resorts to harping back even further to the excesses of the Tsars. At almost every point, he quizzed people about their political views & looked deeply into Russia's social problems, rather than focussing on the kinds of everyday matters that a tourist would want to know about. Yet, despite his repeated references to the way ordinary peoplein Russia live, his main points of contact throughout the book were people of high status (company owners, local community leaders, Tolstoy's descendents, & so on). So much for seeking the hearts & minds of the people.
This book is presents a very negative impression of the world's largest country. (Yet, oddly, Dimbleby doesn't mention the negative impressions that most travellers there would find: the almost complete absence of the concept of "customer service", & bureaucrats who are unhelpful to the point of being downright obstructive. I guess not being able to speak the language does have its advantages - you don't need to face these real-world annoyances.)
This is not so much a journey to the hearts & minds of the Russian people, as a journey to one man's mid-20th-century political prejudices. The only positive thing I can say about it, is that it offers quite a lot of interesting historical background to Russia.
Much ado about nothing - By: Mr. A. N. Hasluem, 14 Jul 2008 I got this book as a gift- fortunately.
I have a good command of English, but I suspect that Dimbleby swallowed a dictionary before writing this. The content (of his 'adventures') is dull.
Nothing more than the self-indulgent musings of a self-pitying journo.
I only got to page 22 before consigning it to the charity shop.
Erroneous and misapprehending - By: Dmitry Luzin, 24 Jun 2008 
After quick first reading I have found how difficult it could be for a West foreigner to learn Russia without more or less good knowledge of Russian language. That is good lesson for Russian authorities if especially they want to attract investments more actively & thus to reopen the country, make it easier to be understood.
In many aspects, the book is full with illusions & stereotypes. The author as a representative of older generation tries to find answers for questions which have been relevant to this audience. This book heads into wrong direction. Worst of all, such the attitude is very close to position of official London.
For example, the author describes Mikhail Khodorkovsky as a man who "worked to create genuine multi-party democracy & strengthen civic institutions". But on the contrary, most of Russians consider him as an intriguer, the man who manipulated the state parliament for his own wealth & power. He has been somewhat analogous to Thomas Howard 4th duke of Norfolkin medieval England, whose destiny was to go under axe of executioner.
I wish the author next time learn languages before depicting countries.
